Few consumer makes be more effective acknowledged as opposed to runners of your LOral Team. The profile of 23 world wide makes such as household names for
 |
| JWT - ANXIETY INDEX - JWT.com |
Few consumer makes be more effective acknowledged as opposed to runners of your LOral Team. The profile of 23 world wide makes such as household names for example Maybelline, Garnier and Biotherm, in addition to the LOral Paris brand name itself, are common at the forefront of their market place, may it be for beauty products, skin care, smell or hair.
Headquartered in Paris, LOral has over a hundred years experience with enhancing the ideal in ladies of every age group and competitions. Now, the group carries a existence in 130 nations around the world and it is 65,000 employees were being guiding product sales of 17.5 thousand recently.
LOrals existence in Asia goes back to 1994. LOral carries a powerful opinion in value of producing close to its marketplaces, explains Vishal Sahgal, commercial movie director of your businesses Pune factory.
However, Asia didn't find a process of liberalisation for overseas firms until the very early 90's, so at first, producing was performed by way of a sub-professional. In 1998 we're eventually able to transfer to direct creation, operated by the fact no person has much more experience than LOral while in the creation of the choices that many of us are renowned for, he gives.
Sales of LOral products in Asia have already been meteoric. We not merely give goods that be more effective with regards to high quality and safe practices, we happen to be crucial in making new markets. By way of example, hair colouration was changed by LOral if we unveiled fashion shades which girls had never been applied in advance of. Our Colouring Naturals brand name is quite readily available, charging close to 2, and yes it has an international high quality standard that has been certainly not obtainable in advance of. In the same manner, we unveiled Indian native people to hair conditioners in my ballet shoes identified speedily absorbed from classic hair natural skin oils, he remarks.
Since 2004, producing for hair, hair colouring and skin care traces for LOrals Purchaser Goods team and Expert Goods team has had place at Pune. We must attract and keep the best ability so as to develop and our very first area was simply too remote, Sahgal explains. Pune is the place the whole functions are now structured so we have as much as 600 people today doing work for us at anyone time.
Sahgal explains that promoting maintainable improvement is really a standard tenet within all plant life and circulation organisations that perform under LOreals patio umbrella. Ecological durability and management and business cultural obligation (CSR) are classified as the side by side pillars that help this wider intention. Even from the strenuous design that every one LOral producing organisations perform, Sahgal is convinced the results ofthe factory at Pune are a great gift. Our Pune manufacturer is different from the team because of its environmentally friendly results, he thinks. Their state government of Maharashtra where by we're also structured presented the Pune manufacturer very first prize while in the High quality in Electricity Administration type last year because of its various electricity resource efficiency tasks.
|
| JWT - ANXIETY INDEX - JWT.com |
 |
| Deepika Padukone - Vogue India Photoshoot - HQ Pics |
Source : http://imentalhealth.net/mental-health-disorders/personality-disorders/l-or-al-india
Related video about L? Or? al India
Ipod Battery Replacement w No Tools
Ipod Battery Replacement w No Tools Replacing your ipods old battery without any tools just the battery it is easy no anxiety no pain then you will have your ipod running L? Or? al India
Commonly question about L? Or? al India
Quanto vale l oro al grammo?
chi sa dirmi quanto costa al gr.l oro in india?What? Maybe you are in the wrong section.
Doesn t this have a very religious nature to it? Ancient Arabs were WISE!!!?
Ancient Arabs make modern Klansmen look tameZanj (Arabic: , "Land of the Blacks" or "Land of the Negroes"1) was a name used by medieval Arab geographers to refer to both a certain portion of the coast of East Africa and its inhabitants, Bantu-speaking peoples called the Zanj.
"As for the Zanj, they are people of black color, flat noses, kinky hair, and little understanding or intelligence."
"We know that the Zanj (blacks) are the least intelligent and the least discerning of mankind, and the least capable of understanding the consequences of actions." Jahiz (d. 868 AD), Kitab al-Bukhala
"Like the crow among mankind are the Zanj for they are the worst of men and the most vicious of creatures in character and temperament." Jahiz, Kitab al-Hayawan, vol. 2
"inhabitants of sub-Saharan African countries are people distant from the standards of humanity" "Their nature is that of wild animals...." Persian geography Hudud al-`alam, 982 AD
"They the Shu`ubiyya maintain that eloquence is prized by all people at all times -- even the Zanj, despite their dimness, their boundless stupidity, their obtuseness, their crude perceptions and their evil dispositions, make long speeches." Jahiz, Al-Bayan wa`l-tabyin, vol. 3
"Galen says that merriment dominates the black man because of his defective brain, whence also the weakness of his intelligence." Mas`udi (d. 956 AD), Muruj al-dhahab
"As regards southern countries, all their inhabitants are black on account of the heat of their climate... Most of them go naked... In all their lands and provinces, gold is found.... They are people distant from the standards of humanity." Hudud al-`Alam, Persian geography, 982 AD
"The Zanj are so uncivilized that they have no notion of a natural death. If a man dies a natural death, they think he was poisoned. Every death is suspicious with them, if a man has not been killed by a weapon." Abu Rayhan al-Biruni, India, 1030 AD
About the Zanj: "Their nature is that of wild animals. They are extremely black." About the Sudan: "Among themselves there are people who steal each other s children and sell them to the merchants when the latter arrive." Hudud al-`Alam, 982 AD
"If (all types of men) are taken, from the first, and one placed after another, like the ***** from Zanzibar, in the Southern-most countries, the ***** does not differ from an animal in anything except the fact that his hands have been lifted from the earth,--in no other peculiarity or property,--except for what God wished. Many have seen that the ape is more capable of being trained than the *****, and more intelligent." Philosopher-theologian Nasir al-Din Tusi (1201-74), Tasawwurat
"Therefore, the ***** nation are, as a rule, submissive to slavery, because Negroes have little that is essentially human and have attributes that are quite similar to those of dumb animals, as we have stated." Ibn Khaldun, Muqaddimah, 14th century AD
"A man of discernment said: The people of Iraq ... do not come out with something between blonde, buff and blanched coloring, such as the infants dropped from the wombs of the women of the Slavs and others of similar light complexion; nor are they overdone in the womb until they are burned, so that the child comes out something between black, murky, malodorous, stinking, and crinkly-haired, with uneven limbs, deficient minds, and depraved passions, such as the Zanj, the Somali, and other blacks who resemble them. The Iraqis are neither half-baked dough nor burned crust but between the two." ibn al-Faqih al-Hamadani, Mukhtasar Kitab al-Buldan, 903 AD
"beyond known peoples of black West Africa to the south there is no civilization in the proper sense. There are only humans who are closer to dumb animals than to rational beings. They live in thickets and caves, and eat herbs and unprepared grain. They frequently eat each other. They cannot be considered human beings." Ibn Khaldun, Muqaddimah
"Blacks are ugly and misshapen, because they live in a hot country." Ibn Qutayba (828-89 A.D.)
"The Zanj are slight-witted (kam aql), and God, most high, has created them stupid, ignorant, and foul (palid)." anonymous, Iskandarnamah, 1343 AD
Nope, Arabs were savages compared to Persians.
Why dont Muslims acknowledge their violent history like Christians do?
Why dont Muslims acknowledge their violent history like Christians do?This is a reasonable question justified by facts presented herein. Anyone who considers it a rant has an agenda which requires them to deny factual history: they cannot be reasoned with.
--------------------------------------
The modus operandi of Christianity was to send missionaries all over the world followed by invading armies, followed by incredibly brutal oppression. That violent history continued for hundreds of years, colonialism finally ending only in the last century. No Christians deny that violent history: in fact, our kids are taught about it in public schools.
But Muslims never acknowledge a similar violent history in advancing Islam, even though there is abundant evidence that Muslims were at least as violent as Christians, to wit:
-In 637AD (as Islam proceeded to conquer Christian Byzantium, the Christian Iberian Peninsula and Hindu India) Muslim General Khalid said: We heard that Byzantine blood is the tastiest, and we have come to drink it. But this is how Egyptian Cleric Hamdan Badr (of the International Union of Muslim Scholars) justified General Khalids aggression on Al-Shabab TV on 12/8/09:
This didnt constitute aggression because we were defending the borders of the Islamic state. We are commanded to enjoin people to worship Allah. That is the mission of every Muslim in this life.
Isnt that the pattern, the modus operandi of Islam today? Muslims self-segregate in ghettos, multiply and expand; Muslim extremists commit violence along the ghetto borders (4/14/07 sydsvenskan.se: Police must escort firemen entering the Muslim ghetto in Malmo, Sweden where Muslim extremists try to kill them) claiming theyre merely defending of Islam? Then the non-extremist Muslims simply fill in the space where non-Muslims fled from? Those borders expand, over hundreds if years, until they engulf the entire nation. Theres plenty of evidence that that is occurring today:
-In August of 2009, after hundreds of years of Muslims defending the borders of Islam in the Balkans, Bosnias Muslim spiritual leader Mustafa Ceric declared Christian Serbian Muslim-majority territory boarding Montenegro as Muslim homelands. (These are the same Muslims we saved from ethnic cleansing by bombing Christian Serbs in the 90 s)
-8/19/10 AndKronos Intl: Muslims claim land INSIDE Montenegro as Muslim homelands.
-8/20/10 AsiaNews, Kashmir : Extremist Muslims are demanding Sikhs convert or leave.
-8/23/10 Reuters, Thailand : Since 2004 Muslim extremists have killed 4,000 Buddhists in southern Thailand, which they are claiming as Muslim homelands.
-And only yesterday (6/13/11 Sofia News): Bulgaria: Muslims Say Bulgaria Plagued with Islamophobia, Vow to Defend Themselves
"Part of the Bulgarian society is plagued with islamophobia," the Bulgarian Chief Mufti s Office has declared in a special statement urging the Bulgarian Muslims to take measures to defend themselves against attacks.
Is this modus operandi of Islam? Is this why Muslims are involved in civil wars in China , Russia , Bosnia , Cyprus , Macedonia , Israel , Pakistan , India , Indonesia-Ambon & Halmarhera , Cte d Ivoire , Kashmir , Kosovo, Kurdistan , Kirghizia , Nigeria , Philippines , Somalia , Turkey , Chechnya , Sudan , Yemen , Thailand , Uganda , Azerbaijan and East Timor? (bing search "civil wars in the world today" to verify). Are they merely defending the borders of Islam?
There are 2 billion christians and 1.5 billion muslims that make up more than half the world s population, and you are putting all 2 billion christians into the same pot that they all acknowledge the violent history of christianity, and all 1.5 billion muslims do not.
I bet you will not find the violence of the Christians in the Americas in this argument. Or the violence and abuse of the USA against countries like Iraq, Vietnam and others in there.
So while certain parts of christianity accept the crusades, they do not accept other things which are just as likely to be seen as religious wars. Afganistan was entered by the US in order to promote al Qaeda and Islam in general as the new common enemy after the fall of communism. The fact that the US is not supposed to be a religious nation, yet managed to treat the millions of muslims in the US in such a disrespectful manner makes it even more shocking, and as for the fact that the republican president was backed up mainly by right wing christians means that it could very well be seen as a religious war with violence from christians against muslims in a much more cynical manner.
Yes you had 9/11 and it was bad. But how many died? Less people than US soldiers died in Iraq. Hmm, and how many civilians died in Iraq because the US failed in have a plan to deal with the situation once they had "won the war"?
I have see the list at the bottom before, and find it is nonsense in many parts. It ignores the reality of many of the situations. Just because there are muslims in the Ivory Coast, does not make it a religious war. Half of those countries do not have a civil war. China doesn t, India doesn t for example.
Perhaps muslims don t take c*** lying down. Chechenya has been at war because of what Stalin did to the people there. At the break up of the USSR they wanted to join other newly formed states, but it was communist/russian orthodox Russia that turned it into a blood bath. Now you do not talk about the war with Georgia in all of this. So it is okay to talk about one conflict here and say muslims are so bad for defending their own land against an evil aggressor, but it is not okay to talk about another similar conflict in which russia is the good guy just around the corner.
Are you trying to re-write history? Do you actually know what the situation is in Somalia, in Chechenya and in every other place? I doubt it, you did a google search and found what you wanted. You did not make an intelligent opinion on the matter.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar